![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
Weighted average cost of capital |
| This article or section includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. You can improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (October 2007) |
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the rate that a company is expected to pay to finance its assets. WACC is the minimum return that a company must earn on existing asset base to satisfy its creditors, owners, and other providers of capital.
Companies raise money from a number of sources: common equity, preferred equity, straight debt, convertible debt, exchangeable debt, warrants, options, pension liabilities, executive stock options, governmental subsidies, and so on. Different securities are expected to generate different returns. WACC is calculated taking into account the relative weights of each component of the capital structure. Calculation of WACC for a company with a complex capital structure is a labourious exercise.
Contents |
The weighted average cost of capital is defined by:

where

and the following table defines each symbol:
| Symbol | Meaning | Units |
|---|---|---|
![]() |
weighted average cost of capital | % |
![]() |
required or expected rate of return on equity, or cost of equity" | % |
![]() |
required or expected rate of return on borrowings, or cost of debt | % |
![]() |
corporate tax rate | % |
![]() |
total debt and leases (including current portion of long-term debt and notes payable) | currency |
![]() |
total market value of equity and equity equivalents | currency |
![]() |
total capital invested in the going concern | currency |
This equation describes only the situation with homogeneous equity and debt. If part of the capital consists, for example, of preferred stock (with different cost of equity y), then the formula would include an additional term for each additional source of capital.
or
WACC1 = wd (1-T) rd + we re
Since we are measuring expected cost of new capital, we should use the market values of the components, rather than their book values (which can be significantly different). In addition, other, more "exotic" sources of financing, such as convertible/callable bonds, convertible preferred stock, etc., would normally be included in the formula if they exist in any significant amounts - since the cost of those financing methods is usually different from the plain vanilla bonds and equity due to their extra features.
WACC is a special way to measure the capital discount of the firms gaining and spending.
How do we find out the values of the components in the formula for WACC? First let us note that the "weight" of a source of financing is simply the market value of that piece divided by the sum of the values of all the pieces. For example, the weight of common equity in the above formula would be determined as follows:
Market value of common equity / (Market value of common equity + Market value of debt + Market value of preferred equity).
So, let us proceed in finding the market values of each source of financing (namely the debt, preferred stock, and common stock).
Now, let us take care of the costs.
And now we are ready to plug all our data into the WACC formula.
Economists Merton Miller and Franco Modigliani showed in the Modigliani-Miller theorem that in an economy with no transaction costs or taxes, financing decisions are irrelevant to the company's value: an all-equity financed company is worth the same as an all-debt financed one. However, many governments allow a tax deduction on interest, thereby creating a bias towards debt financing. However, there is a cost to financial distress (e.g. bankruptcy) which creates a bias towards equity financing. Therefore theoretically, the appropriate level of Debt to Equity in a company will then be the point at which the benefits of the tax shield provided by debt financing are outweighed by the costs of financial distress.
| This article or section includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. You can improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (November 2007) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||